Unprecedented
- Democratic Rep. Rangel Files Ethics
Charges Against Himself
House Ways and Means Committee Chairman
Charles Rangel, D-N.Y., filed an ethics
complaint against himself Wednesday with the
House ethics committee.
The move is believed to be unprecedented.
Rangel took the unusual action in response
to recent news coverage by The Washington
Post and The New York Times, which recently
ran stories raising questions about his
involvement in raising money for an academic
center named in his honor at City College of
New York, and his Harlem rent-controlled
apartments.
"No one's ever filed anything against me
saying that I've done anything wrong. What I
want to do is have a preliminary
investigation of the facts to see if I did
go over the line because there's no question
I was bringing people together," Rangel said
in an interview with FOX News, speaking
about the fundraising.
"I'm just so proud of what I've done that if
there is some blurry line there, let's clear
up the line and let everyone know what it's
all about," he added.
Rangel doesn't deny using congressional
letterhead to ask non-profit organizations
to contribute to the academic center. As far
as the name goes, he said the college
already had decided to name the center after
Rangel.
But ethicists cited by the Post criticized
Rangel's activities, saying Rangel's
position on the tax-writing Ways and Means
Committee, which has broad authority, could
make someone feel like he or she had to
donate money to get favorable treatment by
the congressman. They also said there's a
chance a congressman would steer funds
toward a center with his name on it over
projects that could be more worthy.
At a press conference last week, Rangel said
none of the people who received fundraising
requests had business before his committee
like the Post claimed. He also called on the
Post — or anyone else — to file ethics
charges against him, although it technically
is not an option afforded to those who are
not members of the House.
Rangel initially was not going to bring up
the apartment issue, but he told FOX on
Wednesday that he wanted the House ethics
committee — officially known as the House
Committee on Standards of Official Conduct —
to also clear up that matter.
"I'm not thinking about moving. I know I'm
right legally. But when I met with you
reporters, I thought that if I was going to
do the stationary (matter), and if it's a
question of ethics, let the ethics committee
exonerate me. There is no market rent. And
I'm paying the maximum," Rangel said.
|
Via
TPM
Muckraker:
In
written
answers
to
questions
from the
Senate
Judiciary
Committee,
Bradley
Schlozman,
the
former
Justice
Department
official
and U.S.
attorney
who’s
been at
the
center
of the
firings
controversy,
admitted
that
he’d
once
urged
hiring
certain
prosecutors
for his
office
based on
their
political
affiliation.
It’s
against
civil
service
laws to
do so.
But he
had a
reason,
he
explains
(how
good a
reason,
you can
decide
for
yourself).
When
serving
as the
interim
U.S.
attorney
for
Kansas
City,
Schlozman
had been
unable
to hire
assistant
U.S.
attorneys
on his
own, as
Senate-confirmed
U.S.
attorneys
are able
to do.
For
that, he
had to
go
through
the
central
office,
or in
this
case,
Monica
Goodling,
the
Department’s
White
House
liaison.
He’d
“heard
rumors,”
he
writes,”that
Ms.
Goodling
considered
political
affiliation
in
approving
hiring
decisions
for
career
positions.”
Goodling,
of
course,
admitted
in
testimony
to
Congress
that
she’d
made
sure
that
only
Republicans
were
hired
for
certain
non-political
positions.
And so,
Schlozman
explains,
in order
to
“maximize
the
chances”
of being
able to
hire his
desired
candidate,
he “once
noted
the
likely
political
leanings
of
several
applicants”
in a
conversation
with
Department
officials.
But
there
was no
damage
done!
Schlozman
adds
that
none of
his
desired
candidates
were
hired.
Read
more…
|
|
|
ALBERTO "Seedy" GONZALES RESIGNS
FINALLY, 3
Down (Rummy, Rove and Seedy) and just 2 to Go (Bush
and Cheney)
Ari Fleischer blames Dems for
Gonzales’ mistakes - By: Steve Benen at
Crooks and Liars
I’d almost forgotten how breathtakingly
dishonest former White House press
secretary Ari Fleischer can be.
Yesterday, on Fox News, he blamed
congressional Dems for “politicizing the
Justice Department, unfairly so and
dangerously so.”
Faiz sets the record straight.
- It was Alberto Gonzales,
not Congress, who fired attorneys
for political reasons.
- It was Alberto Gonzales,
not Congress, who gave the White
House political team unprecedented
power to intercede in the affairs of
the Justice Department.
- It was Alberto Gonzales, not
Congress, who allowed his department
to illegally hire attorneys based in
part on their loyalty to the
Republican Party and the Bush
administration.
- It was Alberto Gonzales, not
Congress, who dissembled and misled
about the administration’s spying
activities.
- It was Alberto Gonzales, not
Congress, who lied in stating that
all Bush appointees would be
Senate-confirmed
It’s been years since Fleischer
embarrassed himself regularly to a
national audience. Welcome back to the
show, Ari.
|
The CNN
Quick Vote on Gonzales Resignation
Did Attorney General Gonzales make the right decision by stepping down?
| Yes |
84% |
77802 |
| No |
16% |
14451 |
| Total Votes: 92253 |
|
Like President Bush's
top political adviser, Attorney General
Alberto Gonzales resigned to avoid
encroaching Congressional
investigations, a fired federal
prosecutor said Monday.
During an appearance on CNN, former US
Attorney David Iglesias said Gonzales's
resignation is "absolutely linked with
Karl Rove leaving two weeks ago," and
speculated the two resigned "for the
same reason": Congressional
investigators closing in on their
suspected roles in the attorney-firing
scandal.
"This is what happens when there is not
check and balance" under a
Republican-controlled Congress and White
House "and all of a sudden you have a
new sheriff in town - so to speak - that
wants answers to hard questions."
Due to obstruction by Gonzales and other
Bush officials, Iglesias added, the
extent of the White House's attempt to
have politically inconvenient
prosecutors fired remains unknown. "We
still don't know who put our names on
that list," he said. The former US
Attorney for New Mexico contends that he
was fired after two Congressional
Republicans - Sen. Pete Dominici and
Rep. Heather Wilson - urged him to speed
indictments of a Democratic state
senator before the election.
"What triggered this [resignation] was
Attorney General Alberto Gonzales going
in front of the US Senate and not being
fully candid, telling half truths (and)
having very convenient memory lapses,"
Iglesias said Monday. "Had he shot
straight with the American people and
shot straight with the Senate, perhaps a
lot of this would've been mitigated."
The Justice Department's credibility has
sunk to Nixon-era levels under
Gonzales's soon-to-end tenure, Iglesias
charged. "I'm not aware of the Justice
Department losing so many top people,
probably since ... the early 70s during
the Watergate scandal," he said.
|
|
Bush made "Fredo" fly out to Crawford to
discuss the resignation?
|
Attorney General Alberto R.
Gonzales, whose tenure has been marred
by controversy and accusations of
perjury before Congress, has resigned.
He is expected to announce the decision
to reporters at 10:30 Eastern time this
morning in Washington.
Mr. Gonzales, who had rebuffed calls for
his resignation for months, submitted
his to President Bush by telephone on
Friday, a senior administration official
said.
Mr. Bush has not yet chosen a
replacement but will not leave the
position open long, the official said
early this morning, speaking on
condition of anonymity because the
resignation had not yet been made
public.
Mr. Bush repeatedly stood by Mr.
Gonzales, an old friend and colleague
from Texas, even as Mr. Gonzales faced
increasing scrutiny for his leadership
of the Justice Department, over issues
including his role in the dismissals of
nine United States attorneys late last
year and whether he testified truthfully
about the National Security Agency’s
surveillance programs.
Earlier this month, at a news
conference, Mr. Bush dismissed
accusations that Mr. Gonzales had
stonewalled or misled a congressional
inquiry. “We’re watching a political
exercise,” Mr. Bush said. “I mean, this
is a man who has testified, he’s sent
thousands of papers up there. There’s no
proof of wrong.”
* Let's see if the
DEMS can grow a pair over the recess and
make certain Michael "FEMA Excuses"
Chertoff, or someone like him doesn't
replace Seedy. They need to take
Bush and this time around, because the
DOJ is way too important to allow for an
other Bush hack to take the reins.
|
|
Commentary By:
Richard (I love Chile) Blair from
All
the Spin Zone:
Birds of a Feather: George Bush and Robert
Mugabe
Q: What do George Bush and Zimbabwe’s
strongman Robert Mugabe have in common?
A: They both like spying on their own
citizens. And Mugabe uses Bush to justify
his own despotic domestic surveillance
program…
When I was growing up, the government of the
United States of America seemed to take one
obligation very seriously: setting an
example for the rest of the world on how to
conduct a country’s internal affairs. I’m
willing to conceded that perhaps this
perception was based largely on propaganda
that I was fed as a young lad during my
education, but still, I think most of us
believed that America was a pretty good
place, and that our government led in world
affairs by example.
Interestingly enough, America is still
leading by example.
With all of the outrage from progressives
regarding the Democratic Party-controlled
congress giving the Bush regime everything
it wanted in the new FISA bill, I suppose we
can be forgiven for overlooking a story from
one of the most despotic dictatorships on
the planet. Like George Bush, Zimbabwe
strongman Robert Mugabe recently enacted an
eavesdropping law:
Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe on Friday
signed into law the controversial
Interception of Communications Bill, which
gives his government the authority to
eavesdrop on phone and Internet
communications and read physical mail.
The legislation has drawn outspoken
opposition from the political opposition and
civil society organizations as trampling on
the civil rights of Zimbabweans.
Spokesman Nelson Chamisa of the opposition
Movement for Democratic Change faction of
Morgan Tsvangirai called it an addition to
“the dictator’s tool kit.”
Broad new surveillance powers approved by
Congress this month could allow the Bush
administration to conduct spy operations
that go well beyond wiretapping to include —
without court approval — certain types of
physical searches on American soil and the
collection of Americans’ business records,
Democratic Congressional officials and other
experts said.
“This may give the administration even more
authority than people thought,” said David
Kris, a former senior Justice Department
lawyer in the Bush and Clinton
administrations and a co-author of “National
Security Investigation and Prosecutions,” a
new book on surveillance law.
Several legal experts said that by
redefining the meaning of “electronic
surveillance,” the new law narrows the types
of communications covered in the Foreign
Intelligence Surveillance Act, known as FISA,
by indirectly giving the government the
power to use intelligence collection methods
far beyond wiretapping that previously
required court approval if conducted inside
the United States.
Read more
on how Bush Co. has deceived everyone and
how the main stream MEDIA has failed to do
it's job yet again!
|
Just How many
U.S. Attorneys were fired?
It’s been a little while, but the last time
we checked in with the purge scandal, about
a month ago, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.)
asked the AG how many U.S. Attorneys he’d
fired during his tenure. He said he didn’t
know.
After acknowledging the nine we know about
from the purge, Gonzales said, “I’m not
aware, sitting here today, of any other U.S.
Attorney who was asked to leave — except
there were some instances people were asked
to leave, quite frankly, because there was
legitimate cause.” (Given that he’d just
named nine other U.S. Attorneys who’d been
fired, it sounded like he was conceding that
they’d been fired for illegitimate causes.)
He added, “Senator, there may have been
others [fired prosecutors]. I would be happy
to get back to you with that kind of
information about who has left. But I don’t
know the answer to your question. But I can
certainly find out.”
The good news is, Feinstein has finally
heard back from the Justice Department. The
bad news is, DoJ officials have decided not
to cooperate with the request.
Once again, Seedy has
lied. How much more of his petty
Bull$shit are we going to take? |
YAHOOOOOOooooooo! Goodbye Seedy
Gonzales.
|
Seedy Gonzales - the Bush\Cheney Crime
Syndicate Consigliere!
|
Seedy Gonzales Reunion Tour Produces More Lies, Distortions and Whining from
Seedy Gonzales
 |
WHOOPS, caught in yet another
WHOPPER of a LIE!
FBI Director Robert Mueller told
Congress today that a 2004
confrontation between current
Attorney General Alberto Gonzales
and his predecessor, John Ashcroft,
who was in a hospital bed, concerned
a controversial surveillance program
-- an apparent contradiction
Gonzales' testimony to the Senate.
Damn, the TRUTH just keep rearing
it's ugly head .. right Alberto? |
Jon braves the elements and attempts to ascend the mountain of lies
Alberto Gonzales spewed during
Tuesday’s Senate testimony.
 hold
your breat and listen to the Lying
Man - for more, visit Comedy
Central’s
Indecision2008
|
|
|
click
to watch
Schumer
discuss the
call to
investigate
SEEDY
Gonzales
further…
with a
Special
Investigator.
“The
Attorney
General
took an
oath to
tell the
truth,
the
whole
truth
and
nothing
but the
truth.
Instead
he tells
the
half-truth,
the
partial
truth
and
everything
but the
truth.
And he
does it
not
once,
not
twice,
but over
and over
and over
again.
His
instinct
is not
to tell
the
truth
but to
dissemble
and
deceive.”
|
|
More Stonewalling: Gonzales In The Hot
Seat Again
"I don't
trust
you,"
committee
Chairman
Patrick
Leahy,
D-Vt.,
told
Gonzales.
A
powerful
Senate
Republican
on
Tuesday
told
Attorney
General
Alberto
Gonzales
to
consider
appointing
a
special
prosecutor
to
investigate
the
firings
of
federal
prosecutors.
Sen.
Arlen
Specter
told the
embattled
attorney
general
such
that a
scenario
may now
be
necessary
because,
the
senator
maintained,
Bush
administration
officials
have
made
statements
that
might
have the
effect
of
shutting
down
congressional
supervision.
"The
constitutional
authority
and
responsibility
for
congressional
oversight
is
gone,"
said
Specter,
the
Judiciary
Committee's
senior
Republican.
Gonzales
sat just
a few
feet
away, at
the
witness
table,
as
Pennsylvania
Republican
declared:
"If that
is to
happen,
the
president
can run
the
government
as he
chooses,
answer
no
questions."
The
attorney
general
has the
authority
to
appoint
a
special
prosecutor,"
Specter
added,
looking
Gonzales
in the
eye.
|
WHOOPS, Gonzales was told of FBI violations - Gonzales
lied about Patriot Act abuses
As he sought to renew the USA Patriot Act two years ago,
Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales assured lawmakers that the
FBI had not abused its potent new terrorism-fighting powers.
"There has not been one verified case of civil liberties abuse,"
Gonzales told senators on April 27, 2005.
Six days earlier, the FBI sent Gonzales a copy of a report that
said its agents had obtained personal information that they were
not entitled to have. It was one of at least half a dozen
reports of legal or procedural violations that Gonzales received
in the three months before he made his statement to the Senate
intelligence committee, according to internal FBI documents
released under the Freedom of Information Act.
The acts recounted in the FBI reports included unauthorized
surveillance, an illegal property search and a case in which an
Internet firm improperly turned over a compact disc with data
that the FBI was not entitled to collect, the documents show.
Gonzales was copied on each report that said administrative
rules or laws protecting civil liberties and privacy had been
violated. * GONZO has no
idea what TRUTH is.. does he?
|
 |
President Bush invoked executive privilege Monday to deny
requests by Congress for testimony from two former aides about
the firings of federal prosecutors.
The White House, however, did offer again to make former counsel
Harriet Miers and one-time political director Sara Taylor
available for private, off-the-record interviews.
In a letter to the heads of the House and Senate Judiciary
panels, White House counsel Fred Fielding insisted that Bush was
acting in good faith and refused lawmakers' demand that the
president explain the basis for invoking the privilege.
"You may be assured that the president's assertion here comports
with prior practices in similar contexts, and that it has been
appropriately documented," the letter said.
Retorted House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers:
"Contrary what the White House may believe, it is the Congress
and the courts that will decide whether an invocation of
executive privilege is valid, not the White House unilaterally,"
the Michigan Democrat said in a statement.
The exchange Monday was the latest step in a slow-motion legal
waltz between the White House and lawmakers toward eventual
contempt-of-Congress citations. If neither side yields, the
matter could land in federal court.
"I have to wonder if the White House's refusal to provide a
detailed basis for this executive privilege claim has more to do
with its inability to craft an effective one," he said in a
statement.
The privilege claim on testimony by former aides won't
necessarily prevent them from appearing under oath this week, as
scheduled.
Leahy said that Taylor, Bush's former political director, may
testify as scheduled before the Senate panel on Wednesday. The
House Judiciary Committee scheduled Miers' testimony for
Thursday, but it was unclear whether she would appear, according
to congressional aides speaking on condition of anonymity
because negotiations were under way.
|
Bush told ex-staff to ignore
subpoena
Says it would be 'unfair' for former
director to testify on fired U.S.
attorneys
|
The Bush administration is urging a former White House
political director to ignore a subpoena and not testify before
Congress about the firings of federal prosecutors, her lawyer
says.
The Senate Judiciary Committee wants to hear from Sara Taylor at
its hearing Wednesday and she is willing to talk. Testifying,
however, would defy the wishes of the president, “a person whom
she admires and for whom she has worked tirelessly for years,”
lawyer W. Neil Eggleston said.
Eggleston stated, in a letter this weekend to committee leaders
and White House counsel Fred Fielding, that Taylor expects a
letter from Fielding asking her not to comply with the subpoena.
|
Back on April 19, Attorney General Alberto Gonzales
testified, under oath, that
he had not spoken with “witnesses” in the U.S.
Attorney scandal about the events surrounding the
purge because it would have been inappropriate. He
told the Senate Judiciary Committee, “I haven’t
talked to witnesses because of the fact that I
haven’t wanted to interfere with this investigation
and department investigations.” A month later,
Monica Goodling, immunity in hand, testified that
Gonzales’ claim
wasn’t quite right. She described a meeting in
March, shortly before she resigned from the Justice
Department, in which Gonzales asked her questions
that Goodling said made her “uncomfortable.” She
told lawmakers that the AG seemed to be trying to
compare recollections, so their stories would be
consistent if they were questioned about their
actions. She testified, “I just thought maybe we
shouldn’t have that conversation.”
For Gonzales, this raised the specter of two
new problems, to add to an already long list.
On the one hand, he may have committed obstruction
of justice. On the other hand, he may have lied
under oath about it. As Rep. Artur Davis (D-Ala.)
noted at the time, “It’s very clear that the
attorney general was not fully accurate in his
testimony. It was an inappropriate conversation on
the attorney general’s own terms.”
Apparently, the Justice Department’s own
inspector general and Office of Professional
Responsibility agree — they’ve
launched an investigation into the Attorney
General’s conduct.
(Read the rest of this story…)
|
|
Via
McClatchy:
The White
House’s former
political director
was furious at
Justice Department
officials for
disclosing to
Congress that the
administration had
forced out the U.S.
attorney in Little
Rock, Ark., to make
way for a protege of
Karl Rove, President
Bush’s political
adviser, according
to documents
released late
Tuesday.
Then-White
House political
affairs director
Sara Taylor spelled
out her frustrations
in a Feb. 16 e-mail
to Kyle Sampson,
then the chief of
staff to Attorney
General Alberto
Gonzales.
“Tim was put
in a horrible
position; hung out
to dry w/ no heads
up,” Taylor lashed
out in the e-mail,
which was sent from
a Republican Party
account rather than
from her White House
e-mail address.
“This is not good
for his long-term
career.”
Read more…
She wasn’t worried
about the careers of the
U.S. Attorneys they
helped ruin, she was
upset because Rove’s
unqualified, political
buddy, Tim Griffin had
his reputation
damaged. Don’t worry,
Sara, Timmy landed
on his feet.
|
|
SURPRISE, Surprise... 'No'
to No-Confidence Vote the GOP blocks measure on
Alberto Gonzales
Seven Republicans vote to
force senators to make official their stance on
embattled attorney general, but it isn't enough!
Yes, the Republican's care more about keeping power
than they do about JUSTICE, the rule of law and
TRUST in one's own government. How many more
times do these Republican enablers need to show
themselves for what they truly are before they get
booted from office? When will America wake up
and see who is really playing politics? |
Finally The NO Confidence
Vote Is Set - For Monday 6-11
Today, Sen. Charles E. Schumer (D-NY) announced that a vote of
no confidence in Attorney General Alberto Gonzales will be held
this Monday.
"If all senators who have actually lost
confidence in Attorney General Gonzales voted their conscience,
this vote would be unanimous," said Schumer. "However,
the President will certainly exert pressure to support the
Attorney General, his longtime friend. We will soon see where
people’s loyalties lie."
Think Progress Reports:
Goodling In Private Email: ‘Send Directly Up To Me, Outside The
System’
New Justice Department communications
released tonight (06.06.07) include an email from Monica
Goodling, former counsel to Alberto Gonzales, directing another
official to draw up a directive giving her unprecedented
authority to hire and fire political staffers. Goodling tells
the official, assistant attorney general Paul Corts, to “send
[it] directly up to me, outside the system.”
WHAT? Two sets of books?
Read the exchange:
Uh oh, little "Miss Goody Two Shoes" just may lose her immunity and may wind
up in jail just in time to be pen pals with Paris Hilton.
 |
Raw Story reports:
Leahy, Specter suggest Justice Department investigator probe
Attorney General's conduct
The top Democrat and Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee
have written to the Justice Department's Inspector General seeking
an expansion of an internal investigation to cover the possibility
that the Attorney General may have interfered with the subsequent
testimony of former top aide Monica Goodling. Goodling described
herself as 'not comfortable' with a conversation the Attorney
General initiated with her.
"[Goodling] testified that Mr. Gonzales recounted to her his
recollection of the process leading up to and including the firing
and replacement of several U.S. Attorneys," wrote Senators Patrick
Leahy (D-VT), Judiciary Committee Chairman, and Arlen Specter
(R-PA), the Ranking Republican on the committee. "Ms. Goodling's
testimony prompted Congressman Davis to ask whether the Attorney
General was engaged in inappropriately communicating with someone he
knew was a participant in and witness to the matters under
investigation in order to shape her testimony." |
Arianna Huffington's Huffington Post and
MSNBC report the Newsweek
claims that almost 30
DOJ Officials Threatened To Resign Over Hospital Visit To Ashcroft.
Bush's Monica Problem - Gonzales, the president's lawyer and Texas buddy,
is twisting slowly in the wind, facing a vote of no confidence from the Senate.
Read on:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18881810/site/newsweek
Schumer: Gonzales will face no-confidence vote
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The U.S. Senate will take part in a vote of
no-confidence on embattled Attorney General Alberto Gonzales after debate on the
immigration bill is completed, Democratic Sen. Charles Schumer said Thursday.
The non-binding measure likely will be considered in mid-June, unless the
immigration legislation runs into problems. The House plans to vote on a similar
measure next month, after a congressional recess.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid authorized the introduction of a resolution
requesting the non-binding vote, according to Schumer. Read on:
http://www.cnn.com/POLITICS/blogs/politicalticker/2007/05/schumer-gonzales-will-face-no.html
Seedy Gonzales - Attorneygate, or the magical firing of (at
least) eight U.S. Attorneys!
Don't you just love the Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Pat Leahy’s (D-Vt.)
statement in response to Monica Goodling’s testimony today. It’s actually kind
of funny.
“It is curious that yet another senior Justice Department official claims to
have limited involvement in compiling the list that led to the firings of
several well-performing federal prosecutors. What we have heard today seems to
reinforce the mounting evidence that the White House was pulling the strings on
this project to target certain prosecutors in different parts of the country."
You know, it is curious. These questions are pretty straightforward, but no one
is able to answer them. Lawmakers asked Kyle Sampson about who drew up the list
of U.S. Attorneys to be fired and how those names got on the list. Dunno, he
said. They asked Alberto Gonzales. Beats me, he said. They asked Paul McNulty.
Ask everybody else, he said. They asked Monica Goodling. Ask anybody else, she
said.
As Kevin Drum put it, “Goodling is now the latest high-ranking DOJ official to
say that, really, she has no idea why those U.S. Attorneys were fired last year,
or who made the choices. The list appeared, somehow, but apparently not from any
human hand. It’s a miracle!”
* excerpted from Crooks and Liars
It's bad enough that "Seedy Gonzales" has reduced
our Department of Justice to shambles, and made a
total mockery out of US Attorney's, but these God
awful hearings?
After watching the Monica Goodling testimony and
hearing what the proud graduate of the Pat Robertson
School of Law, (Regent University) had to say, I was
dumbstruck by the brazen and hypocritical Republican
water carrier remarks that followed. I was tempted
to use one of President Bush's favorite saying (No,
not that it's hard work) and call it Political
Theatre, but it more resembled a political cartoon.
Especially this gem from Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa),
"There not only is no evidence of wrongdoing, but
there is no allegation of any wrongdoing on your
part." DUH? Was he listening to Ms Goodling?
Actually congressman she provided NEW evidence that
the committee hadn't heard, made several NEW
allegations and made several admissions of guilt to
law breaking.
Maybe we can all chip in and buy the Iowa
Congressman a much needed hearing aid, and maybe a
moral compass to boot? Hey, while we're at it, maybe
we should get an extra pair of each for both Pete
Domenici and Heather Wilson both of New Mexico?
|
|
|
